LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: poor man's LocalNode

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: poor man's LocalNode
From: Daniel Borca <dborca@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 12:49:58 -0800 (PST)

--- Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Jan 2006, Daniel Borca wrote:
> 
> > After this page, should the client click on
> > any link, it gets bound to either DIP or RIP.
> > The client is not going through LVS anymore.
> 
> the client shouldn't have access to the RIP or DIP.
> The webpages should all be on the VIP.

I know, but there are a bunch of constraints
(stateful applications etc).  The persistence flag
was not allowed.

> > Recently, I was asked to NOT deliver full
> > load on serverA, but rather send a
> > "Service not available" page for all those
> > clients which were meant to get pageB.
> >
> > The problem is: if serverB is really dead,
> > I can only store the "Service not available"
> > page on the Director; but it's already a
> > LocalNode.
> 
> you could tell them, that you need 2 realservers to do this

I did.  No other solution?

Thanks,
Daniel


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>