|
Hi and thanks for answering
> > As you can see the realserver 192.168.100.32:80 is listed
> > as Local. Which DO make sence since that realserver is
> > local to the director im issuing the command on.
>
> do you have 4 boxes or 2?
I have 2 hardware servers.
>
> > Now here comes the problem: If I try to connect to the
> > service, it works 50% of the time. If it hits the Local
> > realserver everything works, but the other 50% of the
> > attemps it tries the other real server, and that just
> > fails.
>
> is the route set correctly for the 2nd realserver?
I guess that depends on what "correctly" means?
This is the routing table for each hardware box:
Server 1:
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
192.168.100.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
eth0
0.0.0.0 192.168.100.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
eth0
Server2:
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
192.168.100.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
eth0
0.0.0.0 192.168.100.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
eth0
> Can you not send alternate blank lines?
Hmm I can if I know what you mean, do you mean the message format of my
first post? If I had varying line space I'm sory there was a lot of cut
and pasting involved. I will try not to do so again.
I can telnet to all the ip's involved from both directors. So I don't
think it's a routing issue per say. If I connect to the virtual ip
(192.168.100.35) from the director I always get to the local realserver
though. I guess that is because the machine has the ip itself. If I use
the realserver ip's from either director I can connect fine to both of
them.
So I'm not really sure what I can try and change to debug this?
Best regards
Jonas Larsen
|
