|
Kyle,
It sounds like your localdirector is in bridging mode (servers
physically wired through the cisco box to the router?)
http://www.austintek.com/LVS/LVS-HOWTO/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO.transparent_bridging.html
LVS doesn't really support it (although Barracuda got it working somehow).
Either try DR as previously suggested or change your topology for NAT.
Or possibly single network (one-arm) NAT (requires routing change on
the servers).
2009/10/21 devnull <devnull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> [Internet] ----> [Firewall] (172.16.1.1) ---> [Local Director] (172.16.1.5)
> ----> {Switch} ----> [Real Server] (172.16.1.55)
>
> The real servers gateway is 172.16.1.1,
>
> I understand why the real server would need the LVS-NAT as its gateway, but
> im looking for a solution that can just replace the LocalDirector, is
> LVS-NAT not what I'm looking for?
>
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
