|
Simon,
We've just ordered 4 servers and a gigabit switch to try and do exctly
this kind of testing.
If anyone has sugestions about a good/simple way of generating the
load and graphing it that would be appreciated.
We did use Avalanche/reflector setup a while back on LVS with a 2.8GHz
Celeron and we got:
840MB throughput on large packets
50,000 TPS on small packets
It was using a small amount of keepalive (we were mimicking a
documented coyote point/F5 test).
On 26 January 2011 00:13, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 05:51:21PM +0000, Malcolm Turnbull wrote:
> > Micah,
> >
> > No one seems to have answered this so I'll go with:
> >
> > "Saturating a gigabit pipe is pretty easy for any recent
> > CPU/Motherboard when in DR mode."
> >
> > So I don't see you hitting any problems.
>
> I am also not aware of any recent numbers.
> But it would be nice if we could get some numbers, somehow.
>
> Perhaps someone could donate some time and/or time on some equipment
> to come up with some numbers.
>
--
Regards,
Malcolm Turnbull.
Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
http://www.loadbalancer.org/
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
