Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+ipvs\:\s+Don\'t\s+protect\s+ip_vs_addr_is_unicast\s+with\s+CONFIG

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+ipvs\:\s+Don\'t\s+protect\s+ip_vs_addr_is_unicast\s+with\s+CONFIG_SYSCTL\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH] ipvs: Don't protect ip_vs_addr_is_unicast with CONFIG_SYSCTL (score: 1): Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:55:46 +0900; Thanks, applied. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-; /html/lvs-devel/2015-09/msg00304.html (12,194 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH] ipvs: Don't protect ip_vs_addr_is_unicast with CONFIG_SYSCTL (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 21:45:28 +0300 (EEST); Hello, Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> Simon, please apply to ipvs-next Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the b; /html/lvs-devel/2015-09/msg00303.html (13,073 bytes)
3. [PATCH] ipvs: Don't protect ip_vs_addr_is_unicast with CONFIG_SYSCTL (score: 1): Author: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman); Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 10:23:27 -0500; I arranged the code so that the compiler can remove the unecessary bits in ip_vs_leave when CONFIG_SYSCTL is unset, and removed an explicit CONFIG_SYSCTL. Unfortunately when rebasing my work on top o; /html/lvs-devel/2015-09/msg00302.html (12,204 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]