- 1. Re: [lvs-users] LVS "Passthrough" (score: 1)
- Author: Owain Jones <Owain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 14:47:25 +0100
- Ah, yes. I appear to have confused myself with my own security measures. I forbade access to certain resources, while I was setting it up and I'd not undone them since. The "connection refused" is my
- /html/lvs-users/2017-09/msg00003.html (10,065 bytes)
- 2. Re: [lvs-users] LVS "Passthrough" (score: 1)
- Author: wferi@xxxxxxx (Ferenc Wágner)
- Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 12:59:58 +0200
- In general there shouldn't be any problems with that: I certainly can access my DR-ed real servers via their RIP addresses. Maybe you should describe your setup to help us understand the situation. -
- /html/lvs-users/2017-09/msg00001.html (8,922 bytes)
- 3. [lvs-users] LVS "Passthrough" (score: 1)
- Author: Owain Jones <Owain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 10:21:59 +0100
- Hi folks, Whilst I've got LVS up and running for load balancing services amongst realservers that come in on the VIP, this effectively disables access to that node on its non-VIP (RIP) LAN address. I
- /html/lvs-users/2017-09/msg00000.html (8,249 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu