Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+LVS\s+configuration\s+using\s+pirahna\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+LVS\s+configuration\s+using\s+pirahna\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [lvs-users] LVS configuration using pirahna (score: 1): Author: "L.S. Keijser" <leon@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:08:45 +0200; You can, and you setup is still okay, except you specified that one realserver has weight '1' and the other '2'. Meaning of every 3 active connections, two will go to 192.168.3.3 and one will go to 1; /html/lvs-users/2012-03/msg00070.html (10,741 bytes)
2. Re: [lvs-users] LVS configuration using pirahna (score: 1): Author: Reet Vyas <reet.vyas28@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:41:49 +0530; what if i want to distributed my incoming req to two different servers.?? _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.; /html/lvs-users/2012-03/msg00069.html (11,823 bytes)
3. Re: [lvs-users] LVS configuration using pirahna (score: 1): Author: "L.S. Keijser" <leon@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 05:47:29 +0200; A request always goes to 1 realserver, not both. Second, you have set 2 different weights to your realservers. Therefor, if the 192.168.3.3 server (weight 2) has finished handling the 'request' and t; /html/lvs-users/2012-03/msg00068.html (10,774 bytes)
4. Re: [lvs-users] LVS configuration using pirahna (score: 1): Author: Reet Vyas <reet.vyas28@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:01:24 +0530; Hi I have configured LVS router and two real servers(Windows 2003) butpackets are e going to only one server not other one and i am using piranha tool .Please help me this is my first installation. T; /html/lvs-users/2012-03/msg00067.html (37,411 bytes)
5. Re: [lvs-users] LVS configuration using pirahna (score: 1): Author: Reet Vyas <reet.vyas28@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:13:35 +0530; Hi request is going to one real server not to both real server . Please suggest TCP 122.166.233.136:80 wlc -> 192.168.3.2:80 Masq 1 0 0 -> 192.168.3.3:80 Masq 2 0 0 TCP 122.166.233.136:5000 wlc TCP 1; /html/lvs-users/2012-03/msg00066.html (31,635 bytes)
6. Re: [lvs-users] LVS configuration using pirahna (score: 1): Author: Reet Vyas <reet.vyas28@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:54:54 +0530; Hi this is my routing tables 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 122.166.233.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 192.168.122.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 virbr0 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255; /html/lvs-users/2012-03/msg00064.html (29,597 bytes)
7. Re: [lvs-users] LVS configuration using pirahna (score: 1): Author: David Coulson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:16:24 -0400; Yes, that won't work - If squid is running on lvs router, and pointed at vip, it's not going to route via lvs. You can't run a lvs client on the lvs router, and in this case squid is the lvs client a; /html/lvs-users/2012-03/msg00063.html (25,588 bytes)
8. Re: [lvs-users] LVS configuration using pirahna (score: 1): Author: Reet Vyas <reet.vyas28@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 19:36:26 +0530; I have squid on lvs router cause my real servers on diif n/w so add squid proxy on lvs and gave real server ip address of my lvs router may be this can be reason i cant access my application using VI; /html/lvs-users/2012-03/msg00062.html (23,907 bytes)
9. Re: [lvs-users] LVS configuration using pirahna (score: 1): Author: David Coulson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 07:47:45 -0400; All I see in your tcpdump is ports 22 and 443. Can you only capture the packets related to the LVS connection? You also need to do the capture on the real server, since that is probably where the iss; /html/lvs-users/2012-03/msg00061.html (21,394 bytes)
10. Re: [lvs-users] LVS configuration using pirahna (score: 1): Author: Reet Vyas <reet.vyas28@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 13:21:52 +0530; Hi I Have reconfigured everything below are the details this is my ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:E8:F6:74:DA inet addr:122.166.233.133 Bcast:122.166.233.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6; /html/lvs-users/2012-03/msg00059.html (18,608 bytes)
11. Re: [lvs-users] LVS configuration using pirahna (score: 1): Author: Enno Gröper <enno+lvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 20:13:50 +0100; Hi, Am 20.03.2012 13:15, schrieb Reet Vyas: Without knowledge about the client, we can't tell. In theory yes, it should work (just looking at the lvs configuration). For now I simply ignore your seco; /html/lvs-users/2012-03/msg00058.html (12,269 bytes)
12. Re: [lvs-users] LVS configuration using pirahna (score: 1): Author: David Coulson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:16:16 -0400; What does your real server see? Only include packets related to your LVS traffic, and make sure you display it as IPs and numeric ports (tcpdump -nn). David __________________________________________; /html/lvs-users/2012-03/msg00057.html (43,772 bytes)
13. Re: [lvs-users] LVS configuration using pirahna (score: 1): Author: Reet Vyas <reet.vyas28@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 18:41:24 +0530; win 1002, options [nop,nop,TS val 622858179 ecr 19927684], length 480 17:58:53.331753 IP ABTS-KK-static-133.233.166. _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation befo; /html/lvs-users/2012-03/msg00056.html (40,938 bytes)
14. Re: [lvs-users] LVS configuration using pirahna (score: 1): Author: David Coulson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 08:19:53 -0400; You need to do a packet capture or something to figure out what is not working. You can't test from the lvs router. You need a separate client. Sent from my iPhone ___________________________________; /html/lvs-users/2012-03/msg00055.html (14,485 bytes)
15. Re: [lvs-users] LVS configuration using pirahna (score: 1): Author: Reet Vyas <reet.vyas28@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:45:02 +0530; I did that but still no luck I just want to know wat i am trying to configure is correct or not .. Can i access url from VIP as 192.168.3.10:8080 or not? this is the VIP of my lvs router and it is wo; /html/lvs-users/2012-03/msg00054.html (14,838 bytes)
16. Re: [lvs-users] LVS configuration using pirahna (score: 1): Author: David Coulson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 07:37:17 -0400; http://kb.linuxvirtualserver.org/wiki/Windows_Servers_in_LVS/DR_and_LVS/TUN_Clusters _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:; /html/lvs-users/2012-03/msg00053.html (13,756 bytes)
17. Re: [lvs-users] LVS configuration using pirahna (score: 1): Author: David Coulson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 07:26:23 -0400; Change it to use DR mode, then on each of your real servers do: iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -d 192.168.3.10 -j REDIRECT does it work then? _______________________________________________ Please rea; /html/lvs-users/2012-03/msg00052.html (12,886 bytes)
18. Re: [lvs-users] LVS configuration using pirahna (score: 1): Author: Reet Vyas <reet.vyas28@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:40:00 +0530; Its yep I am using NAT for this lvs setup gateway of realserver is vip of my lvs router. Is this wrong?? If u can pleas suggest how to do it i wasted my three days still no results :( _______________; /html/lvs-users/2012-03/msg00051.html (11,780 bytes)
19. Re: [lvs-users] LVS configuration using pirahna (score: 1): Author: Graeme Fowler <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:47:43 +0000; Piranha was removed from Fedora 17, which implies that it will be removed from the next release of RedHat Enterprise Linux. As that's some time away, it's going to be around for a while yet. Looking; /html/lvs-users/2012-03/msg00050.html (9,764 bytes)
20. Re: [lvs-users] LVS configuration using pirahna (score: 1): Author: David Coulson <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 06:40:49 -0400; Actually, piranha is supported on el6. I must have been thinking of something else. ldirectord is much better, but I don't believe RedHat ship that with el6. _________________________________________; /html/lvs-users/2012-03/msg00049.html (10,880 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]