Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+in\s+ldirectord\.cf\,\s+the\s+meaning\s+of\s+\'checkcount\'\s+is\s+ambiguous\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+in\s+ldirectord\.cf\,\s+the\s+meaning\s+of\s+\'checkcount\'\s+is\s+ambiguous\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [lvs-users] in ldirectord.cf, the meaning of 'checkcount' is ambiguous (score: 1): Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 08:01:39 +0900; Just an idea as I got the feeling that an upgrade wouldn't bring any other benefits to you. _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's availab; /html/lvs-users/2011-07/msg00024.html (10,571 bytes)
2. Re: [lvs-users] in ldirectord.cf, the meaning of 'checkcount' is ambiguous (score: 1): Author: "Robinson, Eric" <eric.robinson@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 08:03:29 -0700; Okay. That sees like an unusual suggestion. Usually the standard recommendation is to upgrade to the latest version, especially when the one in use is 5 years old. :-) --Eric Disclaimer - July 14, 2; /html/lvs-users/2011-07/msg00021.html (11,025 bytes)
3. Re: [lvs-users] in ldirectord.cf, the meaning of 'checkcount' is ambiguous (score: 1): Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:18:03 +0900; Hi Eric, before upgrading I would check the source code to see if checkcount (or some other option) meets your requirements. _______________________________________________ Please read the documentat; /html/lvs-users/2011-07/msg00020.html (12,233 bytes)
4. Re: [lvs-users] in ldirectord.cf, the meaning of 'checkcount' is ambiguous (score: 1): Author: "Robinson, Eric" <eric.robinson@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 01:33:22 -0700; is ping checkcount neither Horms? have That's delightful, Horms, thanks for the clarification. I don't think my version of ldirectord has the failurecount option. It's been in production since 2006; /html/lvs-users/2011-07/msg00019.html (12,404 bytes)
5. Re: [lvs-users] in ldirectord.cf, the meaning of 'checkcount' is ambiguous (score: 1): Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:55:36 +0900; Hi Eric, sorry for not responding earlier. I've taken a look at the code (in git) and to be honest I don't think that this is my handiwork. But none the less I believe that the situation is: * checkc; /html/lvs-users/2011-07/msg00018.html (10,171 bytes)
6. [lvs-users] in ldirectord.cf, the meaning of 'checkcount' is ambiguous (score: 1): Author: "Robinson, Eric" <eric.robinson@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 04:45:17 -0700; The ldirectord man page states that 'checkcount' only works with ping checks. Then the next sentence goes on to give an example of checkcount being used in conjunction with connectimeout/negotiatetim; /html/lvs-users/2011-07/msg00013.html (9,554 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]