LVS
lvs-devel
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Adding SNAT support to LVS/NAT

To: Julius Volz <juliusv@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Adding SNAT support to LVS/NAT
Cc: lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, j.stubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 11:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008, Julius Volz wrote:

Hi,

I'm wondering about how hard it would be to add SNAT support to IPVS (that is, the director rewriting packets from the client to backends to appear to be from the VIP and some randomly allocated port).

when we've discussed it before, the packets will appear to come from the DIP, a private IP (or whatever IP the servers were using for their default route before they were put into an LVS).

This would allow us to have remote real servers with LVS/NAT.

more importantly, people who are bound by serious IT rules setup by managers, can duplicate their (real) servers only with a change in RIP on each server and can keep the default route.

I realize that Jason Stubb's PRE/POSTROUTING patches would also make this possible, but they seemed risky and we haven't heard of them in a long time.

Jason just sent me his current patch this week. You could ask him for it directly. Apparently it's little/no different to the patch he posted at

http://archive.linuxvirtualserver.org/html/lvs-devel/2008-04/msg00041.html

(hope I'm paraphrasing Horms correctly here...)
Horms would be happy to have this in the main release if it could be invoked as an option.

Also, having this option directly integrated into the rest of the IPVS NAT code might make it easier to use: just add another flag on the ipvsadm command line when you want SNAT for an LVS/NAT backend.

sounds great to me.

From talking to Horms, LVS-NAT (and possibly LVS-DR) sends
the packets to the realservers via

ip_vs_post_routing()

which bypasses the OUTPUT chain. It would seem to me that if you instead injected the packets into the OUTPUT chain, then normal iptables rules could handle the SNAT to the realservers. It might be slower that rewriting the packets yourself, but for a first attempt, I think people will be so happy to have the functionality that they won't quibble about speed.

Joe

--
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>