On Sun, 14 Sep 2008, Julius Volz wrote:
Actually, what if we modify or remove that function to
allow further processing in POSTROUTING? Could SNAT work
with IPVS then?
sounds OK by me. You should get an opinion from people who
know the code better than I do.
The comment above it says that the function specifically
wants to avoid further NAT by netfilter. But is this
always a problem?
I assume the function is there
o to speed up LVS (useful but not required for LVS-NAT)
o to push the layer 2 packet for LVS-DR out on the wire.
This packet has the MAC address of the RIP, but
dst_addr=VIP, so can't be sent through routing.
Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml
Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux!
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html