On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 5:37 AM, Franchoze Eric <franchoze@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 23.07.10, 01:01, "Graeme Fowler" <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> Technically keepalived is not LVS. It's a monitoring/mgmt app which can
>> manage an LVS according to health-check logic. LVS by itself cannot "detect"
>> any form of service failure - it's a fancy router with special rules.
> Ah, ok. Then with iptables I can write keepalived app to insert/remove rules.
> Is there interface to iptables for dynamically turn on/off rules without
> inserting and removing them from the table?
xt_condition is on its way to mainline. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/59578/
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html