|
Ted Pavlic wrote:
> Not only have you now setup persistence by port groups, but you've also
> split your services back up into autonomous services that will not bring
> EVERY server down for the sake of persistence. If FTP goes down on real1,
> real1 only needs to be stopped scheduling for FTP.
>
> What do you think? I've got this setup on my LVSs and it seems to be working
> pretty darn well.
Hi Ted,
This is exactly what we should provide in a written docu. I mean
this is nothing special if you're familiar with ipchains and if
you have good ideas on how to peruse all the possibilities of it.
I've also posted some ideas I had for 'next generation'
loadbalancing setup with fwmarks and I think we should provide
some written examples for those who are not extremely familiar
with the possibilities of ipchains and fwmarking. What do you
think about?
regards,
Roberto Nibali
--
mailto: `echo NrOatSz@xxxxxxxxx | sed 's/[NOSPAM]//g'`
|
