![]() |
lvs-users
|
| To: | Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LVS - jobs? |
| Cc: | Edward Chow <chow@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Avery (yi) Davison" <averyyi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, tc lewis <tcl@xxxxxxxxx>, <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| From: | Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 15 Nov 2000 23:10:14 +0000 (GMT) |
Hello,
On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Joseph Mack wrote:
> I haven't used testlvs and I don't know enough to say whetheer
> anything is gained by making it multi-client.
> I think it just beats up the director and it seems to do that
> quite well from what I hear on the list - it may not need to be multiclient.
You need one testlvs program per CPU/network card and probably
running on 2-3 client hosts to be sure the network is busy enough with
requests to the LVS director. IMO, it is not very difficult to start 2-3
testlvs programs and there is no need to add SMP support for testlvs.
And in the LVS eyes this is a multiclient test.
> Joe
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Monitoring connections., Lorn Kay |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Oddity building LBLC, Julian Anastasov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LVS - jobs?, Joseph Mack |
| Next by Thread: | Re: NFS on LVS, from a newbie, Ijaz Ayyaz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |