|
Julian Anastasov wrote:
> Yes, in fact the patch tries to group different VIPs in one
> fwmark-based service but may be it solves problems when two persistent
> fwmark services share same VIPs and RIPs. May be I'll test it soon
> too. There is no difference in the delivery but the connections are
> accounted in the wrong place (real and virtual service). But I have
> to debug this setup too.
will this break existing setups?
> Agreed. Currently the templates created from two fwmark services
> collide when they share same VIP and there are same RIPs.
we could call it a "new feature" :-)
Joe
--
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center,
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA
|
