Alois Treindl wrote:
> I find two elements of it confusing, see comments marked with 'ALOIS'
> #no default gw for real-server with VS-NAT
> # ALOIS: why do you say 'no default gateway for real-server with VS-NAT'?
> # in the LVS-HOWTO, rev. 1.2, page 129, last line, your write:
> # For VS-NAT, the default gateway for the real-servers is 192.168.1.9
> # (the inside IP of director in this example)
> # also in the example lvs.conf on page 128 (section 11.2, 3rd paragraph from
> # end.
> #----------end lvs_nat.conf---------------------------------
In earlier versions you could set the default gw for VS-NAT here.
However the only gw that works is with the director as default gw.
I decided this gave too many chances to make mistakes. Since
there was only one choice, I let the script do it and I didn't
allow you to set the default gw.
What I've said is confusing. I should instead have said
"script sets it up for you"
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center,
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA