|
Hello,
On Mon, 21 May 2001 adulau-lvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> We are currently using vrrpd
> (http://w3.arobas.net/~jetienne/vrrpd/index.html) and we are quite happy
> for the redundant dns infrastructure.
The people are happy with different things :)
> We wonder why there is not vrrp by default in LVS instead of the multiple
> ARP tricks. The main avantage of VRRP is the virtual mac is not changing
These "tricks" are part of ARP. How many VIPs/VMACs you
support in your setup and how many vrrpd can support in Linux?
> during switch. So the switching is really smoothless...
>
> The vrrpd daemon can't handle multiple monitored circuit (quite useful for
> firewall HA) to not have asymmetric routing between the two.
Please, explain the above paragraph!
> So my question is more : "Is there anybody doing enhancement of vrrpd ?"
Enhancement in what direction? May be the author is more
informed?
> Thanks
>
> alx
> http://www.foo.be/
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
|
