LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: monitoring tools - ldirectord

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: monitoring tools - ldirectord
From: Karl <karl.mueller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:30:54 -0500
We're using a variation on 1.2 below.  Works like a champ.

> 
> I have doubts if patching ldirectord is the right approach. Please
> consider more solutions that work independently of ldirectord. For
> example:
> 
> 1. Localizing your problem/defensive programming:
> 
>    Your webservers should be able to react sensitively to a database
>    failure without relying on ldirectord anyway. Do they?
> 
> 1.1 If the page they generate is OK for a user, there is no need to
>     tell ldirectord anything about the problem
> 
> 1.2 If they can generate a special page that says, for example
>     "status=nodb" instead of "status=ok", you can simply test for
>     "status=ok" in the ldirectord
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>