LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: IPVS Synchronization bug

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: IPVS Synchronization bug
From: Fabrice <fabrice@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 19:26:01 +0200
Hello Julian,

If I understand your statements correctly, I should use "ip route"
instead of "route" because it permits to set the default source
address for a specific interface.

Does it means that if I use the "route" command, the default source
address of all my interfaces is eth0's one?

The IPVS Synchronization daemon knows which interface it uses to
send packets. Wouldn't it be better to get the IP address that is
attached to this interface and set it as the source address of the
packets? So there is no problems when you don't use "ip table"?

I'll configure my routing table with "ip table" tomorrow (the machines
aren't at home :)

Thanks,

Fabrice Bucher



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>