|
Hi Joe,
Yeah, although not strictly production yet I have set it up by writing a few
scripts to mail me when there is a director failover.
Also I get it to write the director status (active/inactive) to a file so
that the realserver monitoring scripts I wrote don't both send me messages
when the LVS topology changes should a realserver die. Only the monitoring
script from the active director will mail me.
Jezz.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joseph Mack [mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 23 May 2002 11:59
> To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: anyone used director failover in production?
>
> From what I can tell (small number of anecdotes), director
> failover is mainly used for planned maintenance and so that
> management can tell customers that their setup has redundancy.
> I haven't heard any stories of failover working in production.
>
> Does anyone have director failover in a production setup, when
> directors have failed and changed over automatically and you've
> only found out about it when the failover mechanism notified
> you (rather than the customers notifying you)?
>
> If so, I'd like to put the info into the HOWTO. Please let
> me know what failed, what system you're using for failover,
> and anything else of interest.
>
> Thanks Joe
>
> --
> Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
> contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center,
> mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
