|
Justin Georgeson wrote:
>
> I have a multi-homed machine (internet and private LAN) running iptables
> and ipvs. The public interface has several IP addresses bound to it. I
> use ipvs to NAT specific IP/port combinations to machines on the LAN.
> For the entire set of NAT ruls I have in ipvs, there are no shared
> public IPs.
I don't know what this last sentence means
(all NATed ports for a given public IP are NATed to a single
> LAN IP) So I wanted to have iptables do it's NAT based on LAN IP (if a
> connection is comfing from 192.168.1.5, NAT it out on eth0:5, since
> eth0:5 is bound to the public IP which has ports NATed by ipvs to
> 192.168.1.5). Am I making any sense?
I'm sure this all means something to you. Can you try again?
Joe
--
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, SAIC contractor
to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center,
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA
|
