On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 11:22:16AM -0500, Matthew Crocker wrote:
> I have an idea I wanted to bounce off you and off the list.
> What is the feasibility of running a daemon on the director and a
> service on the real servers. The real servers would announce the
> services that they are willing to accept. The daemon would control the
> monitoring of the services and building the LVS tables to route the
> services to the real servers. The real servers would monitor their load
> and can add/drop services depending on some local factors. This would
> allow the real servers to handle some more intelligent monitoring and
> simplify the monitoring aspects of keepailved.
It has already begun.