Re: LVS Director as default gw?

To: " users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LVS Director as default gw?
From: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 22:45:56 +0900
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 08:21:06AM -0400, Matthew Crocker wrote:
> >
> >However, you are probably a lot better off to just use LVS-DR.
> >It allows the (actually requires) the return path to the
> >real servers not to go through the Linux Director.
> >
> Actually, this isn't true.  I have a LVS setup with a mix of LVS-NAT 
> and LVS-DR.  All traffic passes through the LVS boxes  works just fine.

Ok, you are correct. LVS-DR allows, but doesn't require the
return path not to pass through the Linux Director.

It used to be the case it was required, I keep forgeting
that has changed.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>