|
Quoting Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> do you really need LVS? you only need failover, not load balancing,
> right?
Correct.
>
> keepalived does the failover bit nicely.
>
Excellent! - Exactly what I was looking for.
Regards,
MB
> (Julian Anastasov is working on making LVS integrate with Netfilter.
> LVS passes on the packets before firewall rules are applied. if the
> code is completed, Netfilter integration will be an option since the
> performance penalty is quite noticable.)
> --
> Kjetil T. | read and make up your own mind
> | http://www.cactus48.com/truth.html
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail was sent via Data FX Online WebMail http://www.datafx.com.au/
|
