RE: LVS/NAT SSL based FTP

To:	"'LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.'" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	RE: LVS/NAT SSL based FTP
From:	Peter Mueller <pmueller@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:17:55 -0800

> Will weights of 100, 75, and 25 work as a percent of
> load for a particular service? Example I want to send
> 100% load for SMTP to first RS1, 75% to RS2, and 25%
> to RS3. 

Assuming weighted round-robin.. if your server gets 200 requests - 

100 go to weight 100
75 go to weight 75
25 go to weight 25.

If your server gets 1000 requests - 

500 go to weight 100
250 go to weight 75
125 go to weight 25.

Etc.

P

---

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.592 / Virus Database: 375 - Release Date: 2/18/2004

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
LVS/NAT SSL based FTP, Kai Re: LVS/NAT SSL based FTP, Horms Re: LVS/NAT SSL based FTP, Joseph Mack Re: LVS/NAT SSL based FTP, pb Re: weights, was Re: LVS/NAT SSL based FTP, Joseph Mack RE: LVS/NAT SSL based FTP, Peter Mueller <=

Previous by Date:	Re: LVS DR + user mode linux, Brett E.
Next by Date:	Re: LVS-TUN not working, Brandon Yap
Previous by Thread:	Re: weights, was Re: LVS/NAT SSL based FTP, Joseph Mack
Next by Thread:	Keepalived Compile Problem, Simon Young
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]