LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Another question about lblc

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Another question about lblc
From: Wensong Zhang <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 21:48:33 +0800 (CST)

On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, [ks_c_5601-1987] 茄版侥 wrote:

> 
> In lblc the server has over loaded and lvs use wlc and allocate a server in
> half load of the server,
> 
> Allocate the weighted least-connection server to IP address.
> 
> Is this means after allocation for ip address, it will not re-back to past
> server ?
> 

No, it will not in most cases. There is only one possible situation that
the current map expires after it is not used for six minutes, and the past 
server is the one with least connections when next access to the ip 
address comes.

> Because in my experiment there is back to the past server.
> 

Hm, maybe it is a coincidence. :)

Regards,

Wensong

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>