LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: Way to go, LVS

To: "'LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.'" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Way to go, LVS
From: Peter Mueller <pmueller@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:08:54 -0800
> Just a note -- I love the software so far :) After installing a 2.6 
> kernel, configuring ipvs, and realizing I needed to add 

Glad it's working well for you.  You're very brave to use 2.6, most of us
are chickens here :).

In my experience LVS is much more reliable than Local Directors, and much
more versatile than F5 servers.  During the 3+ years I've been lurking on
the list and using LVS I believe I've seen 1 serious "you should upgrade
right away" bug, and that bug was only an SMP race condition.  (Most people
use LVS in UP mode anyway).

Cheers,

P

---

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.634 / Virus Database: 406 - Release Date: 3/18/2004
 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>