|
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 06:10:03PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 05:37:36PM +0100, Philip Hayward wrote:
> > Sorry, error in my report. The RH8 servers are running ldirectord1.90 and
> > 1.90 runs correctly on EL3. I guess the problem lies in the changes in 1.91.
> > If I can help in debugging please mail me.
>
> Thanks, I will look into it.
Regretfully I am unable to reproduce this problem using 1.92
(which is the same as 1.91 except for a minor patch relating
UDP port numbers).
The patch below provides some additional debuging information
when running ldirectord -d which may be useful. It also
removes a spurious call to alarm();
--
Horms
Index: ldirectord
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/linux-ha/linux-ha/ldirectord/ldirectord,v
retrieving revision 1.92
diff -u -r1.92 ldirectord
--- ldirectord 10 Sep 2004 04:17:44 -0000 1.92
+++ ldirectord 5 Nov 2004 09:25:13 -0000
@@ -1817,9 +1817,10 @@
my $recstr = $$r{receive};
if($result =~ /error/i ||
($recstr =~ /.+/ && !($body =~ /$recstr/))) {
- alarm(0);
+ &ld_debug(2, "Expected String Not Present");
die("$result");
}
+ &ld_debug(2, "Expected String Present");
};
if ($@) {
@@ -1859,7 +1860,7 @@
return 1;
}
- &ld_debug(2, "Status: $status");
+ &ld_debug(2, "Status: $status (" . (($status==0)?"ok":"fail") . ")");
if ($status ne 0) {
service_set($v, $r, "down");
return 0;
|
