LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: LVS-NAT and Squid Real Server

To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: LVS-NAT and Squid Real Server
From: "Purcocks, Graham" <grahamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 11:10:53 -0500
You do have the real servers with default routes back to the LVS router?
The reason I ask is that NAT knows when the connection is finished as
return packets come via it. So it may be the return packets are not
getting to the LVS router.

I use DR in which they don't so in this case Inactive connections is
normal.

I'm afraid I don't use NAT so beyond this I'm not much use.

Doesn't the Redhat documentation tell you how to do this? If it only
supports NAT it should tell you how to use it! Not much help I know.
Sorry. 

-----Original Message-----
From: lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bunpot
Thanaboonsombut
Sent: 02 November 2005 16:04
To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
Subject: Re: LVS-NAT and Squid Real Server

On 11/2/05, Purcocks, Graham <grahamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Strange. Good job I didn't buy it then :) I need DR on RedHat.
>
> Throw it all away and use Ultramonkey 3. ;)
>

Really bad news for me. My company policy force me to use RHCS. Anyone
can clarify me about this question?

Can LVS forward the request by itself or need iptables to help this
function?
I try to connect the proxy but not work.

ipvsadm show inactive connection instead of active one???

IP Virtual Server version 1.2.0 (size=4096)
Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
  -> RemoteAddress:Port           Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
TCP  172.30.33.89:squid dh persistent 60
  -> 172.30.48.100:squid          Masq    1      0          1





> -----Original Message-----
> From: lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:lvs-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bunpot
> Thanaboonsombut
> Sent: 02 November 2005 15:26
> To: LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list.
> Subject: Re: LVS-NAT and Squid Real Server
>
> On 11/2/05, Purcocks, Graham <grahamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I thought the Cluster Suite was just a Redhat wrapper of LVS so all
> > methods should be available. So does Cluster Suite really = LVS-NAT?
> > What if you want Tun?
> >
> As refer to Red Hat documentation, LVS-NAT is only one topology
> supported by RHCS. LVS-TUN and LVS-DR are not supported. :(
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>