> Is the SNAT rule working without NFCT patch?
> Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
No, this is why got my hands on the patch in the first place.
I have scenarios like this:
CLIENT -> VIP[with_public_ip_1] -> A_REAL_SERVER[private_ip_1]
A_REAL_SERVER[private_ip_1] -> VIP[with_public_ip_1] -> CLIENT
CLIENT -> VIP[with_public_ip_2] -> A_REAL_SERVER[private_ip_2]
A_REAL_SERVER[private_ip_2] -> VIP[with_public_ip_2] -> CLIENT
I'm not sure if i'm beeing clear here, but in simple words: the same public
ip address that the client uses to connect to the LVS should be used as
source ip in the response to the client.
I have multiple public ip addresses that i need to source nat.
The firewall is on the same box as the director.