|
Matthew Crocker schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> I used to run LVS on a cluster years ago, in fact the cluster is
> still running but I haven't been keeping track of the progress for
> LVS. I'm putting together a new cluster and would like to have it
> setup with active/active directors instead of active/passive.
>
> Does anyone have a working configuration using LVS-NAT & active/active
> directors? Assuming I have 2 directors and 4 real servers. Traffic
> is load balanced via per-flow CEF to each director and each director
> then load balances the traffic to one of the 4 servers. How do I
> configure the real servers to send the returning traffic through the
> correct director so it can follow the NAT tables? Or, with the LVS
> directors syncing their connection maps does it even matter?
>
>
>
> -Matt
>
Hi,
I would not choose such a setup. If you only have two directors I would
do active/passive with these and sync their connection tables. Why would
you do load balancing between two machines? In case of a failure one
machine has to take the load anyway.
Michael.
|
