LVS
lvs-users
[Top] [All Lists]
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org
<prev [Date] next> <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR vs. LVS-NAT

from [Janusz Krzysztofik] [Permanent Link]
To: "LinuxVirtualServer.org users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR vs. LVS-NAT
From: Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:49:25 +0100 
Graeme Fowler wrote:
> For -DR, the realserver _needs_ to have the VIP on a loopback (or other)
> alias or it won't be able to create response packets.

Well, I have some LVS-DR real servers without VIP, they use DNAT or 
REDIRECT (VIP->RIP) instead. Maybe this is a solution Andreas is looking 
for.

Janusz
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR vs. LVS-NAT, Andreas Altenburg
Next by Date:  Re: [lvs-users] Load balancing outgoing traffic, Janusz Krzysztofik
Previous by Thread:  Re: [lvs-users] LVS-DR vs. LVS-NAT, Andreas Altenburg
Next by Thread:  [lvs-users] OOM Issue, Valcu Gheorghe
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]