Re: [lvs-users] LDAP and LVS-DR problems

To: " users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] LDAP and LVS-DR problems
From: Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:53:27 -0700 (PDT)
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Bryan Aldridge wrote:

> Joe thanks for the reply!  Tim Mooney's post was the one I 
> was referring to.  In his post here 

funny how he was doing it for years before anyone found out 
about it.

> you can see his output and how he has a high number of 
> inactive connections, where as mine is the opposite.  I am 
> using TLS,

umm, TLS (thread local storage?) just affects the 
application, not the networking, right?

> but nothing is going through ldaps://, that is port 636. 
> Read-only is what I'm after here too.  Good thinking on 
> the TCPdump.  I may give that a shot.

you'll need to do it on the director and realserver to get 
the whole picture.

> Actually I have a virtual http server set up as well using 
> DR, and its working great - shows lots of inactive 
> connections (like it should).

that's good to know.



Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina
jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map
generator at
Homepage It's GNU/Linux!

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>