In regard to: Re: [lvs-users] LDAP and LVS-DR problems, Joseph Mack NA3T...:
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Bryan Aldridge wrote:
>> Joe thanks for the reply! Tim Mooney's post was the one I
>> was referring to. In his post here
> funny how he was doing it for years before anyone found out
> about it.
What's funnier is that I haven't been paying any attention to the
lvs-users mailing list for a couple weeks, and the first message I
happen to look at has my name in it. ;-)
As I said in my original post that Bryan is referring to, all the LVS
infrastructure was set up by someone else long ago. I didn't become
responsible for it until later, and I didn't join the lvs-users mailing
list until later still. I didn't know there was anything special
about LDAP and LVS-DR until it was mentioned on the list. We really
have had it working in our environment for a very long time.
>> you can see his output and how he has a high number of
>> inactive connections, where as mine is the opposite. I am
>> using TLS,
> umm, TLS (thread local storage?) just affects the
> application, not the networking, right?
TLS == Transport Layer Security. It's very close to (but not quite
the same) as SSL v3.
Tim Mooney Tim.Mooney@xxxxxxxx
Enterprise Computing & Infrastructure 701-231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building 701-231-8541 (Fax)
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164