|
Thanks for the hint. HAProxy seems Ok for my need.
Luca
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Malcolm Turnbull
<malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It would be nice if you could do full SNAT in LVS and even better
> transparent SNAT using tproxy (not sure if thats even possible at
> layer 4).....
> But thats a big ask for the developers...
> However Haproxy will easily fit your current requirements, have you
> looked at that?
>
>
>
>>
>> 1. You need to "load balance" several servers, which are on the
>> network 10.3.136.x , and you have the clients *on the same network*.
>> 2. You have to load balance, but you can't touch the servers to be
>> "balanced".
>> 3. You can't change the clients to another network.
>> 4. You want to use SNAT to make the packages looks like coming from
>> the balancer box, so that the servers "answer" to that server, right?
>>
>> If so: it doesn't work. I can think of some ways to solve it, but
>> they are all complicated, and implicate an least one extra computer
>> (real or virtual). I won't describe it here, because I lack the time
>> (I have work to do).
>>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Malcolm Turnbull.
>
> Loadbalancer.org Ltd.
> Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779
> http://www.loadbalancer.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
> http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
>
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
