Re: [lvs-users] NAT timeout question/issue

To: " users mailing list." <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [lvs-users] NAT timeout question/issue
From: Malcolm Turnbull <malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 11:07:42 +0100
On 14 May 2010 19:30, Gary Smith <gary.smith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm running into an issue where load balanced SMTP fails after about 10-20 
> seconds.  The mail server reports that the connection was basically abandoned 
> by the clients, in this case, a corporate email server.  We only see this 
> issue when large emails are coming through.
> Switching it from -s wlc to -p works, but I really want the benefit of wlc. 
>  The servers are NAT'ing as well.  Is there something I can do about the 
> timeout or should I just stick with -p with a reasonable timeout (600 seconds 
> or something).

Drat hit send by mistake!


You should use BOTH -p and -s wlc , i.e. persistence for individual
connections and assign via WLC for new connections.

Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or go to

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>