Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+v7\]\s+ipvs\:\s+allow\s+tunneling\s+with\s+gue\s+encapsulation\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+v7\]\s+ipvs\:\s+allow\s+tunneling\s+with\s+gue\s+encapsulation\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH v7] ipvs: allow tunneling with gue encapsulation (score: 1): Author: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 23:23:45 +0200; Applied, thanks Simon.; /html/lvs-devel/2019-04/msg00012.html (10,015 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH v7] ipvs: allow tunneling with gue encapsulation (score: 1): Author: Jacky Hu <hengqing.hu@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 08:39:13 +0800; Thanks, I'll fllow up on the csum support after the icmp handling is merged. Thanks and Best Regards, Jacky; /html/lvs-devel/2019-04/msg00007.html (43,743 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH v7] ipvs: allow tunneling with gue encapsulation (score: 1): Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 10:41:42 +0100; Hi Jacky, Thanks for answering all my questions. I now am happy with this patch. Please do consider the follow-up work on csum support. Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Pablo, please; /html/lvs-devel/2019-03/msg00039.html (42,421 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH v7] ipvs: allow tunneling with gue encapsulation (score: 1): Author: Jacky Hu <hengqing.hu@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 21:47:26 +0800; That's because of the following new commit introduced some new checks: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/418e897e0716b238ea4252ed22a73ca37d3cbbc1#diff-9783279e0dd62b9f996300a8127ec964R1391 Whi; /html/lvs-devel/2019-03/msg00038.html (39,868 bytes)
5. Re: [PATCH v7] ipvs: allow tunneling with gue encapsulation (score: 1): Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 13:39:09 +0100; I am more thinking of: if (tun_type == IP_VS_CONN_F_TUNNEL_TYPE_GUE) gso_type = SKB_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL; else gso_type = __tun_gso_type_mask(AF_INET, cp->af); I think you intentionally changed this since; /html/lvs-devel/2019-03/msg00037.html (35,123 bytes)
6. Re: [PATCH v7] ipvs: allow tunneling with gue encapsulation (score: 1): Author: Jacky Hu <hengqing.hu@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 19:47:08 +0800; Here is the summary: v7->v6: 1) pass proper gso type mask to gso_inner_segment for gue tunnel v6->v5: 1) simply using an if statement for tun_type discrimination v5->v4: 1) use __be16 for tun_port an; /html/lvs-devel/2019-03/msg00036.html (32,340 bytes)
7. Re: [PATCH v7] ipvs: allow tunneling with gue encapsulation (score: 1): Author: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 10:59:50 +0100; Hi Jacky, It would help a lot if you provided a short summary of what changed between versions of this patch. Should the gso_type really be __tun_gso_type_mask() | SKB_GSO_UDP_TUNNEL. It seems tome t; /html/lvs-devel/2019-03/msg00035.html (28,741 bytes)
8. Re: [PATCH v7] ipvs: allow tunneling with gue encapsulation (score: 1): Author: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 01:55:22 +0200 (EET); Hello, The patch looks good to me, thanks! Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>; /html/lvs-devel/2019-03/msg00034.html (28,300 bytes)
9. [PATCH v7] ipvs: allow tunneling with gue encapsulation (score: 1): Author: Jacky Hu <hengqing.hu@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 18:31:21 +0800; ipip packets are blocked in some public cloud environments, this patch allows gue encapsulation with the tunneling method, which would make tunneling working in those environments. Signed-off-by: Jac; /html/lvs-devel/2019-03/msg00030.html (23,711 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]