Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+In\s+DR\s+mode\,\s+source\s+IP\s+address\s+of\s+real\s+servers\'\s+reply\s+packets\s+are\s+different\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+In\s+DR\s+mode\,\s+source\s+IP\s+address\s+of\s+real\s+servers\'\s+reply\s+packets\s+are\s+different\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [lvs-users] In DR mode, source IP address of real servers' reply packets are different (score: 1): Author: feng zheng <zf5984599@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:35:10 +0800; 2013/2/27 Malcolm Turnbull <malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.o; /html/lvs-users/2013-02/msg00045.html (11,173 bytes)
2. Re: [lvs-users] In DR mode, source IP address of real servers' reply packets are different (score: 1): Author: Malcolm Turnbull <malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:19:17 +0000; I would bet that the loopback/arptables method would reply as the VIP, and the iptables REDIRECT method would reply as the RIP... But I'd be interested to know for certain, as I've often wondered if; /html/lvs-users/2013-02/msg00043.html (10,070 bytes)
3. Re: [lvs-users] In DR mode, source IP address of real servers' reply packets are different (score: 1): Author: Khosrow Ebrahimpour <khosrow.ebrahimpour@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 08:08:47 -0500; Hi, Have you resolved the ARP problem on the real servers? Have a look at http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/docs/arp.html for a number of solutions to the problem. ___________________________________; /html/lvs-users/2013-02/msg00042.html (10,692 bytes)
4. [lvs-users] In DR mode, source IP address of real servers' reply packets are different (score: 1): Author: feng zheng <zf5984599@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:32:54 +0800; hi ,dear all I met one problem of LVS DR mode issue last day. All packets could be received by the LVS Director, and be directed to Real Servers. But when Real Server replying, I used "tcpdump" to ch; /html/lvs-users/2013-02/msg00040.html (9,148 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]