Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+TUN\s+and\s+PMTU\s+solved\s+or\s+still\s+work\s+around\s+needed\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[lvs\-users\]\s+TUN\s+and\s+PMTU\s+solved\s+or\s+still\s+work\s+around\s+needed\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [lvs-users] TUN and PMTU solved or still work around needed? (score: 1): Author: Per Jessen <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 10:14:38 +0200; I am not aware of any other solution that explicitly setting the MTU. I have had such a setup for about ten years. -- Per Jessen, Zürich (17.1°C) http://www.dns24.ch/ - your free DNS host, made in Sw; /html/lvs-users/2015-09/msg00006.html (9,288 bytes)
2. [lvs-users] TUN and PMTU solved or still work around needed? (score: 1): Author: Phillip Moore <pdm@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:19:54 -0500; We are using IPVS with TUN/ipip and recently ran into the MTU issue (packets too big and PMTU not working) that is discussed at length in the LVS-HOWTO.LVS-Tun document. We came up with the same work; /html/lvs-users/2015-09/msg00005.html (9,083 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]