|
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008, Simon Horman wrote:
> IPVS patches almost always go through netdev and Dave Miller.
> Dave has a two tree system that works as follows (as far as I
> understand):
>
> Suppose that the current version that Linus's tree is working towards
> is 2.6.24. Then Dave's net-2.6.24 tree would be for bug fixes and
> his net-2.6.25 tree would be for new features.
>
> Once Linus releases 2.6.24 then his merge window for will 2.6.25 open
> and likely stay open for a couple of weeks. I think that at that
> time Dave's net-2.6.24 will be removed and net-2.6.25 will be merged
> into Linus's tree. Once the merge window is closed and Linus's tree
> is working towards 2.6.25 then net-2.6.25 will become the bugfixes
> tree for netdev and net-2.6.26 will be creted to accept new work.
Thanks for the explanation! So I will try to always keep up to date
with his latest tree.
> So with a bit of luck the LOCAL_IN stuff might go into net-2.6.26
> (I think it would be pushing it to get it into net-2.6.25). In any
> case, if you subscribe to this list (which is rather low volume),
> then you will probably see any discussions that are going on.
Good. If you mean this list (lvs-devel), I am already subscribed (so
no need to CC me usually, as I will look through all mails). I will
also subscribe to linux-netdev, but since the traffic there is higher,
I won't read through all of it ;)
Regards,
Julius
--
Google Switzerland GmbH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
