Julius Volz wrote:
I guessed from the name and other uses that __constant_htons() is just
a version of htons() optimized for values that are constant at compile
time. Is this right? But htons() is fine too in any case.
I think the __constant one is for initializations. All I know is that
someone (Stephen Hemminger?) always points this out in other patchsets,
so I beat him to it.
So why can't you just create one ip_vs_debug_packet_v6() instead of these ah
and esp ones which are identical?
If you look at the original files, the whole ip_vs_proto_ah.c and
ip_vs_proto_esp.c are 100% identical except for the protocol names /
constants :-/ So I stuck with this pattern for now. Maybe it would
make sense to join those two files in a change separate from the v6
functionality? There's already a lot of duplication in the existing
IPVS that could be removed...
I didn't look too closely, there's a lot of patches! :) Doing it in a
separate patch is probably a good idea though.
-Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|