LVS
lvs-devel
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IPVS: use pr_err and friends instead of IP_VS_ERR and

To: Hannes Eder <heder@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] IPVS: use pr_err and friends instead of IP_VS_ERR and friends
Cc: lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:56:55 -0700
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 22:35 +0200, Hannes Eder wrote:
> Since pr_err and friends is used instead of printk there is not point
> in keeping IP_VS_ERR and friends.
> +                     pr_err("Schedule: port zero only supported "
> +                            "in persistent services, "
> +                            "check your ipvs configuration\n");

You might consider ignoring the checkpatch 80 char limit here
and consolidate the message into a single string.

It helps when grepping.

> @@ -377,8 +377,8 @@ static int ip_vs_svc_hash(struct ip_vs_service *svc)
>  static int ip_vs_svc_unhash(struct ip_vs_service *svc)
>  {
>       if (!(svc->flags & IP_VS_SVC_F_HASHED)) {
> -             IP_VS_ERR("ip_vs_svc_unhash(): request for unhash flagged, "
> -                       "called from %p\n", __builtin_return_address(0));
> +             pr_err("ip_vs_svc_unhash(): request for unhash flagged, "
> +                    "called from %p\n", __builtin_return_address(0));

Maybe use something like:
        "%s(): <foo> called from %pf",
         __func__, __builtin_return_address(0)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>