LVS
lvs-devel
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: ldirectord: a new format of ldirectord.conf for IPv6

To: horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: ldirectord: a new format of ldirectord.conf for IPv6
Cc: lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Sohgo Takeuchi <sohgo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 00:13:30 +0900 (JST)
Hi simon,

From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
|
> Hi Takeuchi-san,
> 
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:13:24AM +0900, Sohgo Takeuchi wrote:
>> 
>> Hi simon,
>> 
>> From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> |
>> > On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 06:35:49PM +0900, Sohgo Takeuchi wrote:
>> >>     [Candidate 3] Completely separate IPv4 and IPv6 using
>> >>   "hoge6" keywords.
>> >>     
>> >>     Adding new keywords which denote IPv6. These keywords can
>> >>     handle IPv6 only and have a name "hoge6".
>> >> 
>> >>   fallback=fallback.example.com
>> >>   fallback6=fallback.example.com
>> >>         virtual=virtual.example.com:daytime
>> >>       real=real1.example.com:daytime gate
>> >>       real=10.10.10.10:daytime gate
>> >>           
>> >>   virtual6=virtual.example.com:daytime
>> >>       real6=real1.example.com:daytime gate
>> >>       real6=[2001:db8::10]:daytime gate
>> >>       fallback6=localhost:daytime
>> >> 
>> >>     This way is very similar to [Candidate 2]. But it is
>> >>     consistent and easy to read. A demerit is a bit redundant?
>> > 
>> > I like candidate 3. Yes, it is redundant, but it is also very clear
>> > and consistent.
>> 
>> Yes.
>> 
>> I have implemented [candidate 3]. Now it works good.
> 
> Great, once you've finished your testing please post the patch.

Sure!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>