Hi simon,
From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
|
> Hi Takeuchi-san,
>
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:13:24AM +0900, Sohgo Takeuchi wrote:
>>
>> Hi simon,
>>
>> From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> |
>> > On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 06:35:49PM +0900, Sohgo Takeuchi wrote:
>> >> [Candidate 3] Completely separate IPv4 and IPv6 using
>> >> "hoge6" keywords.
>> >>
>> >> Adding new keywords which denote IPv6. These keywords can
>> >> handle IPv6 only and have a name "hoge6".
>> >>
>> >> fallback=fallback.example.com
>> >> fallback6=fallback.example.com
>> >> virtual=virtual.example.com:daytime
>> >> real=real1.example.com:daytime gate
>> >> real=10.10.10.10:daytime gate
>> >>
>> >> virtual6=virtual.example.com:daytime
>> >> real6=real1.example.com:daytime gate
>> >> real6=[2001:db8::10]:daytime gate
>> >> fallback6=localhost:daytime
>> >>
>> >> This way is very similar to [Candidate 2]. But it is
>> >> consistent and easy to read. A demerit is a bit redundant?
>> >
>> > I like candidate 3. Yes, it is redundant, but it is also very clear
>> > and consistent.
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> I have implemented [candidate 3]. Now it works good.
>
> Great, once you've finished your testing please post the patch.
Sure!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|