|
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 10:56:19AM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, 2 Oct 2010, Simon Horman wrote:
>
> >> Here dport:
> >>
> >>>+ dport = dest->port;
> >>
> >> should be:
> >>
> >> dport = ports[1];
> >> if (dport == svc->port && dest->port)
> >> dport = dest->port;
> >
> >Thanks, fixed.
>
> I'm still wondering, may be it needs separate patch
> but we do not support NAT to different dest->port in the
> case for fwmark. May be the above logic can be changed to
> support it. By this way web to different VIPs and VPORTs
> in a single virtual service (fwmark) can use single NAT
> real server for name-based virtual hosting. But such change
> can create compatibility problems for setups that used
> different vports for the fwmark service and still expect
> it in that way (vport to same dport).
Hi Julian,
I think that this sounds line a new flavour of fwmark virtual services to me.
Perhaps yet another flag is in order?
To be clear, what you have in mind is essentially to nat *:* (as matched by
a fwmark) to x:y, where as at this time *:y may be natted to x:y.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|
