lvs-devel
|
To: | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched: Add cond_resched_rcu_lock() helper |
Cc: | Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>, Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@xxxxxxxxxx> |
From: | "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 1 May 2013 10:30:35 -0700 |
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 06:57:49PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 09:02:18AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > My guess would be for the case where sched_preempt_enable_no_resched() > > is followed some time later by cond_resched(). > > I might hope not.. preempt_enable_no_resched() is nasty and you're likely to > be > hit with a frozen fish of sorts by tglx if you try to use it ;-) I will stick with my guess, though I agree that if I am correct, this situation almost certainly predates tglx's Linux-related use of frozen fish as projectile weapons. ;-) Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html |
Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched: Add cond_resched_rcu_lock() helper, Peter Zijlstra |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched: Add cond_resched_rcu_lock() helper, Julian Anastasov |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched: Add cond_resched_rcu_lock() helper, Peter Zijlstra |
Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched: Add cond_resched_rcu_lock() helper, Julian Anastasov |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |