LVS
lvs-devel
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [PATCH 1/2] netfilter: ipvs: avoid unused variable warnings

To: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] netfilter: ipvs: avoid unused variable warnings
Cc: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>, Wensong Zhang <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>, Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, coreteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:28:17 +0100
On Thursday 28 January 2016 08:39:53 Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:01:42PM +0200, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> > 
> >       Hello,
> > 
> > On Wed, 27 Jan 2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > 
> > > The proc_create() and remove_proc_entry() functions do not reference
> > > their arguments when CONFIG_PROC_FS is disabled, so we get a couple
> > > of warnings about unused variables in IPVS:
> > > 
> > > ipvs/ip_vs_app.c:608:14: warning: unused variable 'net' 
> > > [-Wunused-variable]
> > > ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:3950:14: warning: unused variable 'net' 
> > > [-Wunused-variable]
> > > ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:3994:14: warning: unused variable 'net' 
> > > [-Wunused-variable]
> > > 
> > > This removes the local variables and instead looks them up separately
> > > for each use, which obviously avoids the warning.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> > > Fixes: 4c50a8ce2b63 ("netfilter: ipvs: avoid unused variable warning")
> > 
> >       Looks like your previous patch for ip_vs_app_net_cleanup
> > was delayed in ipvs-next tree. I guess, Simon should drop it and
> > use this one instead when net-next opens:
> > 
> > Acked-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
> 
> Thanks, and sorry about not pushing the other patch to net-next.
> I have dropped it and queued up this one in its place.

Ah, I had not realized that the other patch was still in ipvs-next
and not merged in mainline. I did most of my testing on linux-next
(with the previous patch) and then validated the new one on
4.5-rc1, which led me to update it to contain the same hunk again.

Replacing the original patch works fine though, thanks for picking
it up!

        Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lvs-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>