Hello,
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019, Haishuang Yan wrote:
> Test virtual server via ipip tunnel.
>
> Tested:
> # selftests: netfilter: ipvs.sh
> # Testing DR mode...
> # Testing NAT mode...
> # Testing Tunnel mode...
> # ipvs.sh: PASS
> ok 6 selftests: netfilter: ipvs.sh
>
> Signed-off-by: Haishuang Yan <yanhaishuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
It is good to have IPVS selftests... This is a good start,
later we can add IPv6...
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/netfilter/ipvs.sh | 33
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/netfilter/ipvs.sh
> b/tools/testing/selftests/netfilter/ipvs.sh
> index 40058f9..2012cec 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/netfilter/ipvs.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/netfilter/ipvs.sh
> @@ -167,6 +167,33 @@ test_nat() {
> test_service
> }
>
> +test_tun() {
> + ip netns exec ns0 ip route add ${vip_v4} via ${gip_v4} dev br0
> +
> + ip netns exec ns1 modprobe ipip
> + ip netns exec ns1 ip link set tunl0 up
> + ip netns exec ns1 sysctl -qw net.ipv4.ip_forward=0
> + ip netns exec ns1 sysctl -qw net.ipv4.conf.all.send_redirects=0
> + ip netns exec ns1 sysctl -qw net.ipv4.conf.default.send_redirects=0
> + ip netns exec ns1 ipvsadm -A -t ${vip_v4}:${port} -s rr
> + ip netns exec ns1 ipvsadm -a -i -t ${vip_v4}:${port} -r ${rip_v4}:${port}
> + ip netns exec ns1 ip addr add ${vip_v4}/32 dev lo:1
> +
> + ip netns exec ns2 modprobe ipip
> + ip netns exec ns2 ip link set tunl0 up
> + ip netns exec ns2 sysctl -qw net.ipv4.conf.all.arp_ignore=1
> + ip netns exec ns2 sysctl -qw net.ipv4.conf.all.arp_announce=2
> + ip netns exec ns2 sysctl -qw net.ipv4.conf.all.rp_filter=0
> + ip netns exec ns2 sysctl -qw net.ipv4.conf.lo.arp_ignore=1
> + ip netns exec ns2 sysctl -qw net.ipv4.conf.lo.arp_announce=2
arp_ignore and arp_announce are not used on "lo". And MAX
is used, i.e.
# for all interfaces use (suitable for our test setup):
all.arp_ignore=1
all.arp_announce=2
# or if above is not desired, for specific LAN interface use
veth21.arp_ignore=1
veth21.arp_announce=2
BTW, the picture has ns2/veth12 while it should be veth21.
Also, should we check if IPVS module is loaded? Eg. depending
on present /proc/sys/net/ipv4/vs/ dir ?
> + ip netns exec ns2 sysctl -qw net.ipv4.conf.lo.rp_filter=0
IIRC, lo.rp_filter is never used, packets from "lo" always come
with attached output route, so source validation is not performed.
> + ip netns exec ns2 sysctl -qw net.ipv4.conf.tunl0.rp_filter=0
> + ip netns exec ns2 sysctl -qw net.ipv4.conf.veth21.rp_filter=0
> + ip netns exec ns2 ip addr add ${vip_v4}/32 dev lo:1
> +
> + test_service
> +}
> +
> run_tests() {
> local errors=
>
> @@ -182,6 +209,12 @@ run_tests() {
> test_nat
> errors=$(( $errors + $? ))
>
> + echo "Testing Tunnel mode..."
> + cleanup
> + setup
> + test_tun
> + errors=$(( $errors + $? ))
> +
> return $errors
> }
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
|