LVS
lvs-devel
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: [PATCH][next] treewide: uapi: Replace zero-length arrays with flexib

To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] treewide: uapi: Replace zero-length arrays with flexible-array members
Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx, dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-m68k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-can@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux1394-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, io-uring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lvs-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mtd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kasan-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, nvdimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, coreteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-perf-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sctp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-stm32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, target-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, v9fs-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-hardening@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 20:27:37 +0200
On 6/27/22 8:04 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare
having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure.
Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these
cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should
no longer be used[2].

This code was transformed with the help of Coccinelle:
(linux-5.19-rc2$ spatch --jobs $(getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN) --sp-file script.cocci 
--include-headers --dir . > output.patch)

@@
identifier S, member, array;
type T1, T2;
@@

struct S {
   ...
   T1 member;
   T2 array[
- 0
   ];
};

-fstrict-flex-arrays=3 is coming and we need to land these changes
to prevent issues like these in the short future:

../fs/minix/dir.c:337:3: warning: 'strcpy' will always overflow; destination 
buffer has size 0,
but the source string has length 2 (including NUL byte) [-Wfortify-source]
                strcpy(de3->name, ".");
                ^

Since these are all [0] to [] changes, the risk to UAPI is nearly zero. If
this breaks anything, we can use a union with a new member name.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] 
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.16/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/78
Build-tested-by: 
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/62b675ec.wKX6AOZ6cbE71vtF%25lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Hi all!

JFYI: I'm adding this to my -next tree. :)

Fyi, this breaks BPF CI:

https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/runs/7078719372?check_suite_focus=true

  [...]
  progs/map_ptr_kern.c:314:26: error: field 'trie_key' with variable sized type 
'struct bpf_lpm_trie_key' not at the end of a struct or class is a GNU 
extension [-Werror,-Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end]
          struct bpf_lpm_trie_key trie_key;
                                  ^
  1 error generated.
  make: *** [Makefile:519: 
/tmp/runner/work/bpf/bpf/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_ptr_kern.o] Error 1
  make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
  Error: Process completed with exit code 2.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>