LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: maximum table size for active connections

To: Rodney Rutherford <rodneyr@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: maximum table size for active connections
Cc: linux-virtualserver@xxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Brad Midgley <brad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 13:17:12 -0600 (MDT)
this is a related question:

has anyone experimented with multiple director nodes pointed at the same
cluster? a traditional load-balancer like round-robin dns could be used to
choose one of the directors...

if the bottleneck is going to continue to be the director, this could be
an interesting direction.

brad

On Mon, 10 May 1999, Rodney Rutherford wrote:

> What is the maximum table size for the active
> connections? (The default is 2^12--would 2^20 work?)
> 
> (Yes, this is a *large* load.)
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 

Brad
brad@xxxxxxx | http://www.pht.com/~brad/



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>