|
On Mon, 21 Jun 1999, psysadmin wrote:
> Unless it's a logistical problem, it would be best to allow SSL over any
OK
> By the way, I want to commend you on your responsiveness and desire to
make this product work well.
we talk a lot, getting something done is harder :-)
> >If you want to put SSL into our code, give Wensong a yell and let him know
> >you're interested.
>
> What is his email address?
Wensong Zhang <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> If you are swamped with other things to work on,
> I'd be happy to lend a hand.
I don't know whether we're swamped or not, but it
will go faster with another person in the loop.
>
> >if you do an FPGA let us know how it goes.
> >if you'd like to dovetail with our stuff let us know too.
>
> I spoke with an old EE professor of mine and he is optimistic about a
> hardware implementation. If it happens, I'd like very much to talk with you
> at length about algorithms and the like. How might we make software and
> hardware work together?
exploratory discussions are hard by e-mail,
are you in USA?
I'm at 919-541-0007 (North Carolina, USA, UTC-4hrs) - w - I'm here
6:30am - 4:30pm
I could put a summary here after we've talked.
> PS I received an email from you which appears to be a communication between
> you and Lars Marowsky-Bree about SSL. Was this something you intended to
> forward to me?
It depends on what was in the reply field. I tried to include
you in replies, since you triggered the topic. If you're
on the LVS mailing list, you should have got most of it.
It will be in the LVS mail archives if you missed anything.
> It appears that Mr. Marowsky-Bree has useful knowledge on
> this subject.
Since he's going to read this, I think it best to agree with you here
and say that he appears to have useful knowledge.
I won't be surprised if he knows a few more things too.
Joe
--
Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
