Ted Pavlic wrote:
>
> Is this a bug or a feature of the PCC scheduling...
>
I don't know how to answer this. :-)
> A person connects to the virtual server, gets direct routed to a machine.
> Before the time set to expire persistent connections, that real machine
> dies. mon sees that the machine died, and deletes the real server entries
> until it comes back up.
>
> But now that same person tries to connect to the virtual server again, and
> PCC *STILL* schedules them for the non-existent real server that is
> currently down. Is that a feature? I mean -- I can see how it would be good
> for small outages... so that a machine could come back up really quick and
> keep serving its old requests... YET... For long outages those particular
> people will have no luck.
>
You can set the timeout of template masq entry into a small number now.
It will be expired soon.
Or, I will add some codes to let each real server entry keep a list of
its template masq entries, remove those template masq entries if the
real
server entry is deleted.
Thanks,
Wensong
> ? Bug or feature?
>
> All the best --
> Ted
>
|